There’s something about UFOs that has people hooked, and always in search of clues in order to prove the existence of alien life. As of now, almost all of the evidence that was put forth has been debunked in one way or the other. But, hasn’t stopped people from going out of their way to find further clues that can prove alien existence, even if it meant searching google earth images tirelessly!
Thanks to Scott Waring, the proprietor of UFOsightingsdaily.com, who came across a google earth image showing the ‘UFO sighting.’ Now, not much can be said about the credibility of Waring’s work as most of it is said to be ‘100% proof’ of ancient aliens and their existence. He also enjoys spending time trying to get a hold on NASA’s rover’s photograph. He claims to know a lot about alien life, including the monkey on Mars and the 24 foot tall Martian Monarch who was killed 1 million years ago in a battle.
What Did Waring Come Across?
The photo that has caused frenzy amongst the Alien fanatics is a picture of a circle, which is said to be approximately 6.8 kilometers in diameter, and is visible from 325 miles of the Lima Coast. The thing that sets this particular circle apart is that it seems to be elevated from the seabed like a mountain or a hill. There could be many explanations to the odd phenomenon observed on the seabed, such as the ocean floor being pictured by a source that works by combining different resolutions and details, which are put together to create an entire map.
What Did Waring Actually Come Across?
The ‘UFO’ found on the seabed was just the work of man-made technology, and definitely not aliens. They appear to be pictures that have been stitched together, creating an illusion of a raised circle in the entire map. The long lines that are shown on the ocean floor are just another example of the technology putting together images, and, believe it or not, these long lines are often mistaken as a sign of a lost civilization.
So, should you believe everything you see on the internet or google earth images? Probably not!